Sarah Van Emst vs Hanne Vandewinkel Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
S. Van Emst vs H. Vandewinkel

Sarah Van Emst
NED
w
w
w
l
w
w
l
w
l
w
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
20
Age
21
-
Height
-
540
C. Rank
138
540
Best Rank
138
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Hanne Vandewinkel
BEL
l
w
w
l
w
w
w
w
w
w
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
20
Age
21
-
Height
-
540
C. Rank
138
540
Best Rank
138
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Emst 1 - 0 Vandewinkel
They have played 3 sets in total, with Sarah Van Emst winning 2 and Hanne Vandewinkel winning 1. The last match between Sarah Van Emst and Hanne Vandewinkel was at the W35 Amstelveen, 03-07-2024, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Sarah Van Emst getting the victory 6-4 2-6 7-5.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Emst | 1 |
Vandewinkel | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) W35 Amstelveen(07-03-24)
Sarah Van Emst
6
2
7
Hanne Vandewinkel
4
6
5
S. V. Emst vs H. Vandewinkel H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
61.54% (80-50) | Career Total W/L | 68.03% (183-86) |
1 | Clay | 0 |
1 | Titles | 10 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 100.00% (1-0) |
S. V. Emst vs H. Vandewinkel Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sarah Van Emst has won 39.68% of points on their second serve, while Hanne Vandewinkel has won 37.91%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sarah Van Emst, in recent form, has won 52.34% of their opponent's second serve points, while Hanne Vandewinkel has won 52.05%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.97% and 33.20% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sarah Van Emst has saved 48.55% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hanne Vandewinkel has saved 49.78% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sarah Van Emst has won 65.00% of matches played (W/L 39/21), with Hanne Vandewinkel winning 67.86% (W/L 57/27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sarah Van Emst has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 70% (W/L 31/13), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/1). Hanne Vandewinkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 70% (W/L 71/25), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/1).
- Player level: In the last year, Sarah Van Emst has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 20/10), where as Hanne Vandewinkel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 71.62% of matches (W/L 53/21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Sarah Van Emst winning 1 times and Hanne Vandewinkel being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Sarah Van Emst winning 2 and Hanne Vandewinkel winning 1.
- The last match between Sarah Van Emst and Hanne Vandewinkel was at the W35 Amstelveen, 03-07-2024, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Sarah Van Emst getting the victory 6-4 2-6 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 3:5:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sarah Van Emst has played against opponents with an average rank of 369.53 while Hanne Vandewinkel has played against players with an average rank of 274.87.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sarah Van Emst has won 35% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hanne Vandewinkel has won 75% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sarah Van Emst has converted 39.46% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hanne Vandewinkel has converted 39.93% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Sarah Van Emst vs Hanne Vandewinkel Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
S. V. Emst vs H. Vandewinkel H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 1 |
15 | Games Won | 15 |
1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
7 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
3:5:0 | Average Match Time | 3:5:0 |
56% (60/107) | 1st Serve % | 80% (91/114) |
67% (40/60) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (54/91) |
40% (19/47) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (11/23) |
28% (5/18) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (5/10) |
43% (49/114) | Return Points Win % | 45% (48/107) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Emst 46%, Vandewinkel 44%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Emst 58%, Vandewinkel 58%.
Break Points Saved %: Emst 56%, Vandewinkel 54%.
S. V. Emst Recent Matches Played
H. Vandewinkel Recent Matches Played

S. V. Emst vs H. Vandewinkel Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
61.54% (80/50) | YTD Win/Loss | 68.03% (183/86) |
59.20% (177/122) | Sets Win/Loss | 63.74% (392/223) |
54.73% (1505/1245) | Games Win/Loss | 55.76% (3151/2500) |
70.45% (31/13) | Hard Win/Loss | 73.96% (71/25) |
57.32% (47/35) | Clay Win/Loss | 64.38% (94/52) |
66.67% (2/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 69.23% (18/8) |
0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
152 | Aces Total | 381 |
0.36 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.4 |
484 | Total Double Faults | 1109 |
1:35:37 | Average Match Time | 1:47:17 |
423.98 | Average Opponent Rank | 432.64 |
56% (4386/7781) | 1st Serve % | 67% (11524/17260) |
63% (2775/4386) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (7164/11524) |
45% (1538/3395) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (2586/5736) |
49% (511/1043) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (1211/2495) |
48% (3716/7750) | Return Points Win % | 48% (8579/17843) |
0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 33.33% (2/4) |
0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 40.00% (2/3) |
0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
60.87% (28/18) | Challenger W/L | 67.68% (134/64) |
62.65% (52/31) | Futures W/L | 76.27% (45/14) |
60% (76/126) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 68% (182/267) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
56% (14/25) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (27/53) |
51% (21/41) | Deciding Set Win % | 67% (52/78) |
89% (74/66) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 93% (166/154) |
11% (74/8) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 7% (166/11) |
23% (56/13) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 28% (103/29) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
06:00 AM 23/10/25
PredictionW1
1.21
W2
4.05
08:30 PM 22/10/25
PredictionW1
1.23
W2
3.84
01:00 PM 23/10/25
PredictionW1
2.78
W2
1.44
09:15 PM 22/10/25
PredictionW1
1.081
W2
7.7
09:00 PM 22/10/25
PredictionW1
1.63
W2
2.18
07:00 PM 22/10/25
PredictionW1
1.58
W2
2.27
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
22 Oct 2025
Erste Bank Open – Vienna Preview And Prediction: Tallon Griekspoor vs Brandon Nakashima Betting Tips & Picks October 22, 2025
22 Oct 2025
Shuai Zhang vs Veronika Erjavec Prediction – WTA Guangzhou Open – 22nd October 2025 Best Bets
22 Oct 2025
Casper Ruud vs Quentin Halys Prediction – ATP Swiss Indoors Basel – 22nd October 2025 Best Bets
22 Oct 2025
Damir Dzumhur vs Corentin Moutet Prediction – ATP Erste Bank Open – 22nd October 2025 Best Bets
22 Oct 2025
Swiss Indoors Basel – Basel Preview And Prediction: Jenson Brooksby vs Alejandro Davidovich Fokina Betting Tips & Picks October 22, 2025
22 Oct 2025
Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Jiri Lehecka Prediction – ATP Swiss Indoors Basel – 22nd October 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
14:30
H2H 1-2
16:00
H2H 3-0
18:30
H2H 2-1
13:00
H2H 2-1
05:30
H2H 2-1
Tennis Events This Week
Erste Bank Open - Vienna
Austria
Swiss Indoors Basel - Basel
Switzerland
Brest Challenger
France
Costa do Sauipe Challenger
Brazil
Hamburg Challenger
Germany
Sioux Falls Challenger
United States
Suzhou Challenger
China
M15 Bol
Croatia
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Santiago
Chile
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Norman
United States
M25 Santa Margherita di Pula
Italy
M25 Sarreguemines
France
M25 Sheffield
Great Britain
M25 Sintra
Portugal